CRWP-5891-20 IN THE H (107) NEETU DEVI A STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. *** MANISHA BAT 1. The the Constitution the official respo petitioners at the representation da 2. At t submitted that t 16.05.2026 befo (Annexure P-4) r but the same has 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CR Dat EVI AND ANOTHER Versus
F PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG ***
BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed tution of India seeking issuance of a w l respondents No.2 and 3 to protect at the hands of respondents No.4 to 5 tion dated 16.05.2026 (Annexure P-4). At the very outset, learned couns that the petitioners have recently before the Senior Superintenden 4) raising their grievances as mentio e has not yet been considered and no AB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-5891-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents MANISHA BATRA
or the petitioners or DAG, Punjab iled under Article 226/227 of of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the .4 to 5 and to take action on their 4). counsel for the petitioners has ently filed a representation on tendent of Police, Gurdaspur mentioned in the present petition nd no action has been taken AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5891-20 thereon. He furth satisfied if appr Superintendent o filed by the petiti 3. Noti 4. Ms. notice on behalf be done in due c her during the co 5. In v commenting any disposed of at th aforesaid represe within a period accordance with petitioners, the o in order to protec
20.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) e further submitted that at this stage f appropriate directions are issued to dent of Police, Gurdaspur to decide th e petitioners and take necessary action Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ehalf of the respondents-State and su due course. Let a complete set of the the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made g anything on the merits of the cas f at this stage with a direction to resp epresentation dated 16.05.2026 (Annex eriod of 15 days from today, by pa with law. Needless to say, if an , the official respondents would provi protect their life and liberty. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
  
stage, the petitioners would be ued to respondent No.2-Senior cide the aforesaid representation action thereon. or DAG, Punjab, has advance and submits that the needful will of the paperbook be supplied to made by the petitioners, without the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order in if any threat is found to the provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No
AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.