Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19430 (JHR)

LAKHIRAM HEMBRAM @ EDWINSING SOREN @ EDVIN SINGH SOREN@ EDWIN SINGH SOREN @ REDO SINGH @ SONIRAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5654/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19836 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5654 of 2026 ----- Lakhiram Hembrom @ Edwinsing Soren @ Edvin Singh Soren @ Edwin Singh Soren @ Redo Singh @ Soniram, son of Phochei Hembram @ Redo Singh @ Jaikob Soren, resident of Patharbari, PO and PS Kachuhgaon, District Kokarajhar, State Assam … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, APP …...... 02 /06.07.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 353, 333, 307, 325, 34 of the IPC and Sections 27(1-b)a/26/27/35 of Arms Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 4. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in BA No. 11957 of 2022 and BA No. 8846 of 2024 was rejected by this Court. 5. Since there is direct allegation against the petitioner of committing murder of the police personal, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer of bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the specific allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with S.T. No. 366 of 2022 arising out of Barhait PS Case No. 100 of 2020, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj stands rejected. 2026:JHHC:19836 2 7. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only six witnesses remained to be examined and the next date fixed for evidence is 16.07.2026. 8. Today, the Superintendent of Police, Sahibganj who is present online to assist this Court submits that within six weeks he will produce all the witnesses. 9. The Trial Court is thus directed to conclude the trial on day to day basis. On the next date fixed i.e. 16.07.2026 the prosecution will produce two witnesses before the Trial Court and the remaining witnesses must be produced between 20th July 2026 to 07th August 2026. The Court will fix the dates accordingly and will try to record the evidence of the prosecution witnesses within the aforesaid period. Thereafter the Court will hear the parties and try to conclude the trial as early as possible without giving unnecessary adjournments. 10. With the aforesaid observation, this bail application is dismissed. 11. The appearance of the Superintendent of Police, Sahibganj is dispensed with. 12. Let a copy of this order be immediately faxed to the Superintendent of Police, Sahibganj and the Principal District Judge, Sahibganj to communicate the same to the concerned Court. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 06.07.2026 Tanuj/CP-3 Uploaded on 09.07.2026