IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10980 of 2026 Decided on: 6th August, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tamanna Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Sandeep K. Pandey, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of the decision taken by the State on 29.07.2026, the prayer made by the petitioner in this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 Accordingly, the present writ petition to stand disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 06, 2026 Judge Mukesh