Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1942 (JHR)

VIKASH KUMAR SINGH ALIAS VIKASH SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./721/2026 · 2026-02-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3476 --1-- A.B.A. No. 721 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 721 of 2026 ---- Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Singh, aged about 29 years, son of Shatrughna Singh, resident of village – Laxmipur, PO and PS – Barhara, District – Bhojpur (Bihar), presently at Fine Products, Chapangi, PO and PS – Tejara, Bhiwandi, District – Alwar, Rajasthan .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Advocate ---- 04/10.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramna P.S. Case No.109 of 2024 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Nagar Untari. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received a call from Mobile No.9366085619 regarding the sanction and deposit of loan under P.M. Kisan Yojna and subsequently an amount of Rs.98,703/- was credited in the account of the petitioner at Kotak Mahindra Branch, Faridabad Sector-16 and after the credit of the said amount an amount of 2026:JHHC:3476 --2-- A.B.A. No. 721 of 2026 Rs.4,999/- was immediately withdrawn from the same source from which the money has been credited. He further submits that in view of that the petitioner has approached the bank on the same day and informed the bank about the credit amount without his knowledge. He then submits that the petitioner has also replied to the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the account of the petitioner the amount has been credited. 5. Considering that the petitioner has immediately informed the bank about credit of the said amount in the account of the petitioner and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 10.02.2026 Sangam/