Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19415 (CHH)

GHANSHYAM AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1015/2026 · 2026-05-07

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21654 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1015 of 2026 Ghanshyam Agrawal S/o Late Maniklal Aged About 52 Years Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Ranveerpur, Police Station Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station House Officer, Police Station Excise Circle Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For the petitioner : Mr. Kanhaiya Ram Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Deepeshwari Mahilwar, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Order on Board 08/05/2026 By this petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS 2023, the petitioner prays for correction of the order dated 25.02.2026 passed in Cr.A.No.209/2022 (Ghanshyam Agrawal Versus State of Chhattisgarh) regarding the name of counsel. Shri Kanhaiya Ram Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while disposing of CRA No. 209 of 2022, he had appeared and argued the case on behalf of Mr. Anurag Bajpai, counsel for the appellant but inadvertently, in the order dated 25.02.2026 name of Mr. Dharmesh ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Digitally signed by ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Date: 2026.05.09 12:02:34 +0530 2 Srivastava has been typed, therefore, he prays for deleting the name of “Mr. Dharmesh Srivastava”. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that “Mr. Anurag Bajpai, Advocate” be mentioned in place of Mr. Dharmesh Srivastava, Advocate, in the appearance column of the Order dated 25.02.2026 passed in CRA No. 209/2022. Accordingly, the order dated 25.02.2026 is corrected to the above extent. Consequently, this petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao