Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19407 (RAJ)

RAGHUNATH S/O SHRI RAMDEV JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7014/2025 · 2026-01-22

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3074] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7014/2025 Raghunath S/o Shri Ramdev Jat, R/o Village Khandach, Bander Sindri, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Bholu Ram Chouhan S/o Shri Harchand Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Khandach, Police Station Bandarsindri, Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Saini for Mr. Gaurav Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.117/2025 registered at Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 351(2), 324(4), 352 & 331(6) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submits that now, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. [2026:RJ-JP:3074] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7014/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that in cross-FIR No.134/2025 registered in the same police station, verification report has been received which shows that parties have entered into compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.117/2025 registered at Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /52