- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26812 CRL.RP No. 458 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.458 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA B.G., S/O K.R. GANESHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.142, 3RD MAIN, 4TH CROSS, RAMANJANNEYA NAGAR, SUBRAMANYA PURA, CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU – 560 061. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PHANIRAJ KASHYAP, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SREE CHARAN SOUHARDHA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.HO.87/1, H.B.SAMAJA ROAD BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU – 560 004 REP. BY ITS SALES OFFICER, SRI. M.V. VENKATESH. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H.P.MADHU, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.03.2023 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.495/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE LV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26812 CRL.RP No. 458 of 2023 (CCH-56) BENGALURU AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 01.04.2022 PASSED IN C.C.NO.7931/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE XL ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT (40th ACMM) BENGALURU, CONSEQUENTLY, ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FROM THE OFFENCE ALLEGED AGAINST HIM. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent is absent. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner has availed the loan and the same is not disputed and the issuance of the cheque is also not disputed. However, the counsel would contend that both the two cheques were bounced and thereafter payment was made. The learned counsel not disputes the fact with regard to the balance of amount was pending with the bank, but no document is placed before the Court that the subsequent payment made is in respect of these two cheques, which were bounced. When such being the case, I do not find any ground - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26812 CRL.RP No. 458 of 2023 to entertain the revision petition. Both the Courts have taken note of the material available on record, particularly the revision petitioner admitted the cheque and also admitted the bouncing of cheque. The only contention is that subsequent to the bouncing of these two cheques, the payments are made in favour of the bank in respect of these two cheques. But in order to substantiate the same, nothing is placed on record. There is no any rebuttable evidence before the Court. Under these circumstances, I do not find any ground to admit the revision petition. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32