Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19405 (CHH)

MOHD. ANIS MEMON v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1722/2022 · 2026-05-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22396 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1722 of 2022 Mohd. Anis Memon S/o Late Abu Bakar Aged About 48 Years R/o Ward No. 6, Akaltara, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Town Administration, Mantralaya, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director/ Deputy Director Town Administration Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Council Akaltara, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh 4 - Chairman Municipal Council Akaltara, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Amina Bai Wd/o Haji Mohammad Harun Aged About 73 Years R/o Village Akaltara, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State : Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 12.05.2026 1. Today, when the case was called for hearing, despite repeated calls, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner did not appear and no representation was made on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition. There was also no request for YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.05.12 18:36:23 +0530 2 adjournment nor any explanation offered for such non- appearance. In the aforesaid circumstances, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. 2. Ms. Anusha Naik, learned Deputy Government Advocate, is present. 3. In view of the continued non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner and the apparent lack of interest in pursuing the writ petition, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/-/- /- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh