[2026:RJ-JP:3479-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16956/2025 M/s Gvpr Engineers Ltd., Registered Office At 8-2-293/82/a, Plot No. 739-A, Road No. 37, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad- 500033, Authorized Signatory Shri P. Uma Shanker, Associate Vice President (Legal), Gvpr Engineers Ltd. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Principal Commissioner, The Central Goods And Service Tax, Ncrb, Statue Circle, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Goods And Service Tax Council, Through Its Secretary, Tower-Ii, 5Th Floor, Jeevan Bharti Building, Janpath Road, Cannuaght Place, New Delhi. 4. Office Of The Chief Engineer (Project), Public Health Engineering Department, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 5. Executive Engineer, Phed, House No. C-3, Bmk Residency, Talbi Road, Bhinmal Distt. Jalore 6. The Union Of India, Through Secretary Ministry Of Finance, North Block New Delhi 110001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG Mr. Yuvraj Singh Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore, Adv. Ms. Harshita Verma, Adv. Mr. Rohan Mittal, Adv. HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to the order dated 12.01.2026 passed by a Co-ordinate [2026:RJ-JP:3479-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-16956/2025] Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16254/2025, which is reproduced as under:- “It is apparent that the dispute raised in the present writ petition is neither actually with regard to the tax imposition by the Tax Authorities, nor it is with regard to the interpretation of the provisions of the GST Act. It is essentially the dispute between the petitioner and the Additional Chief Engineer, who alleged to have not complied with the State Government Notification dated 07.01.2021. The issue has to be examined by the learned Single Judge. It is always open for the learned Single Judge to examine whether the writ would be maintainable or the matter has to be taken up before the concerned Commissioner Court. The Registry is directed to re-register the case as S.B. Civil Writ Petition.” 2. In view of the above, the directions give in the aforequoted order shall apply in the present as well. 3. The instant writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 4. The stay petition as well as pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 8-Nirmala/Shivani