2026:JHHC:19825 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6259 of 2026 Vivek Narsaria, son of Raj Kumar Narsaria, aged about 35 years … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P --- 02 /06.07. 2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.03.2026 in connection with CID Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 318(2), 318(3), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (B), 66(C), 66(D) of Information Technology Act, 2000, pending in the court of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner (II), Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the bank account of the petitioner has been utilized for the commission of alleged offence and the petitioner is not directly involved in the alleged offence. He has also submitted that the petitioner is a victim of the circumstances. He is in custody since 26.03.2026. The chargesheet has been submitted on 23.06.2026 and on the same date, cognizance has been taken. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submits that it is not in dispute that the bank account of the petitioner was provided by the petitioner himself which was utilized for the purpose of commission of offence and there are transactions of sum of Rs.1.86 crore to the account of the petitioner. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegation against the petitioner and that the bank account of the petitioner is alleged to have been utilized for commission of offence and there are numerous complaints of cyber offence against the account of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined 2026:JHHC:19825 2 to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. 6. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 06.07.2026 Uploaded on 09.07.2026 Pramanik/