[2026:RJ-JP:3072] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7011/2025 Bholu Ram Chouhan S/o Shri Harchand Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Khandach, Police Station Bandarsindri, Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Raghunath S/o Shri Ramdev Jat, R/o Village Khandach, Bander Sindri, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Shubham Saini for Mr. Gaurav Rathore, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.134/2025 registered at Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 324(5) & 324(6) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cross cases have been registered between the parties. It is submitted that main allegation in the FIR is that firearm was used, but admittedly, it is a case of no injury. It is also contended that petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel contends that during the course of investigation, parties have entered into compromise and they have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. [2026:RJ-JP:3072] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7011/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor places verification report dated 20.11.2025 received from the SHO, Police Station Bandar Sindri, District Ajmer. According to which, parties have entered into compromise. The said report is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.134/2025 registered at Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /256