Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1939 (ALL)

SOMAI RAM v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6887/2026 · 2026-05-06

Prakash Padia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6887 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Aggrieved against the order of suspension dated 10.04.2026 passed by the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Basti/respondent no.3 by which petitioner was transferred from one revenue village to another revenue village in the same district is under challenge in the present writ petition. 2. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that against the aforesaid transfer order petitioner has already submitted a representation before the District Magistrate, Basti as well as respondent no.3 on 13.04.2026, copy of the postal receipt is appended at page no.18 of the paper book. Since no decision has been taken hence present writ petition. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for State-Respondents, submits that in case petitioner joins the transferred post within a week, his representation will be considered and decided in accordance with law preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Somai Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to petitioner to join the transferred post within a week from today and respondent-Competent Authority is directed to decide petitioner's representation within three weeks thereafter in accordance with law. May 7, 2026 Pramod Tripathi WRIA No. 6887 of 2026 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad