Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19388 (CHH)

ABHAY KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2641/2026 · 2026-05-20

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23456 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2641 of 2026 1. Abhay Kumar Verma S/o Lt. V.K. Verma Aged About 60 Years R/o In Front Of Mrityunjaya Temple, New Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 491001 2. Padma Verma W/o Mr. Abhay Kumar Verma Aged About 55 Years R/o In Front Of Mrityunjaya Temple, New Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 491001 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 2. The Tehsildar Tehsil Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 3. C I C I Bank Limited Through Authorized OfÏcer, Commercial Complex, Nehru Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate. For respondent No.3 : Mr. Ashish Mitthal, Advocate. 2 (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 21/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the matter is pending before Debts Recovery Tribunal at Jabalpur and is listed in the month of June 2026 but the DRT at Jabalpur is not functioning, As such, the matter has not been taken up for hearing and the same may cause irreparable loss to the petitioners. He would further submit that the matter is urgent, therefore, he may be allowed to prefer an appeal or an appropriate application before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Allahabad for redressing their grievance as dispossession notice has already been issued to them on 11-3-2026. 2. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners seems to be just and proper. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal along with copy of the order passed by this Court before the DRAT at Allahabad for hearing the matter. In the eventuality of filing of an appeal before DRAT at Allahabad, the said Tribunal shall hear and decide the matter expeditiously, in accordance with law 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. 5. Consequently, all the pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2026.05.22 10:41:39 +0530 3