M/S SREE JAYA K SIVA RAO JV v. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR
CC/1905/2024 · 2026-01-21
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19387 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19387 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010150322024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1905/2024 Between:
1. M/S SREE JAYA K SIVA RAO JV, 8-3-669/10/5, PLOT NO.792, M, M.P.C.H SOCIETY, J.P. NAGAR, YELLAREDDYGUDA, HYDERABAD REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K. SIVA RAO, S/O. LATE KUTUMBA RAO
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT (WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT) A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI S S RAWATH, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI C R RAJAGOPAL, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, HNSS CIRCLE NO.3, MADANAPALLE.
4. SRI D RAMESH BABU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AVRHNSS DIVISION-12, KUPPAM HNSS CIRCLE NO.3, MADANAPALLE CHITTOORDISTRICT
5. SRI SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT (WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT) A P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT
6. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT A P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT
7. SRI G SURESH BABU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AVRHNSS DIVISION-12 KUPPAM HNSS CIRCLE NO 3 MADANAPALLE CHITTROOR DISTRICT RR NOS 5 TO 7 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 05 11 2024 VIDE I A NO 1 OF 2024 IN CC NO 1905 OF 2024
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondentsherein for wilfully and deliberately
violating the
order passed by this Honble Court inW.P.No.32295/2022, dated.06.12.2023 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the Proposed Respondents No.5 to 7 as Respondents No.5 to 7 in Contempt Case No. 1905 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with personal appearance of the Respondent No.6 on 26.03.2025 in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to recall the bailable warrant issued by the Hon'ble Court on 28-04-2025 against me in CC. No. 1905 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pLeased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued by this Hon'ble Court on 17.12.2025 against the Respondent No.6 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. K M KRISHNA REDDY
3. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:1905 OF 2024
ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.32295 of 2022.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 06.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.32295 of 2022 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner did not refute the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents and requested to close the contempt case.
5. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 22.01.2026 BSP
114
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
Contempt Case No.1905 of 2024
22.01.2026 BSP