[2026:RJ-JP:4412] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14072/2025 Narendra Kumar S/o Amar Chand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kawar Thana Chauth Ka Barwada District Sawai Madhopur (Ra- jasthan) (Accused Petitioner At Present Confined In Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutors ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1652/2026 Shobha D/o Shri Lallulal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bonli, Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur, Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka Mr. Anshuman Saxena Mr. Deepesh Kumawat Mr. Vishal Gurjar Mr. Amit Choudhary Ms. Manisha Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Jitendra Singh, SHO, Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. These bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS have been filed on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.327/2025 registered at Police Station [2026:RJ-JP:4412] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14072/2025] Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2) & 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023 & Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. They submit that according to the prosecution case, maximum allegation against the petitioners is that Rs.12,00,000/- has been received in the bank account of the petitioner-Shobha and the said bank account was being operated by the petitioner- Narendra Kumar. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and there are no criminal antecedents against them. Trial of the case will take considerable time and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is [2026:RJ-JP:4412] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14072/2025] directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Narendra Kumar S/o Amar Chand & 2) Shobha D/o Shri Lallulal shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail. If any breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /38-39