Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19382 (AP)

M/s Coastal Andhra Agri Feed Technologies v. The Authorized Officer

WP/7893/2026 · 2026-03-29

Lisa Gill, Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010146822026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3575] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT PETITION NO: 7893/2026 Between: 1. M/S COASTAL ANDHRA AGRI FEED TECHNOLOGIES,, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.V.RAMANAIAH NAIDU S/0 LATE VEERA RAGHAVAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, FLAT NO.401, PUSHPAK VIHAR APARTMENT, BABA NAGAR, NEAR VIJETHA SUPER MARKET, PM PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530 041, A. P STATE ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, CANARA BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, VAKALAPUDI BRACH, KAKINDA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. CHUNDRU VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D.NO. 23-128/6, PARTNER OF M/S RISHIKAGRO FEED INDUSTRY, VIGNESWARA NAGAR, RAMAYYAPETA, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT, AP 4. THE REGISTRAR, HON'BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM, AP ...RESPONDENT(S): CORAM:- THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE LISA GILL THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Present:- Ms. Thota Suneetha, Advocate for petitioner. W.P No.7893 of 2026 -2- Mr.Sreedhar Valiveti, learned counsel for respondents. *** LISA GILL,J. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner being aggrieved of order dated 23.02.2026 passed by learned Debts Recovery Tribunal, dismissing I.A.No.448 of 2026 filed by the petitioner. 2. I.A.No.448 of 2026 was filed by petitioner under Order XII Rule 8 of CPC read with Section 66 of Indian Evidence Act read with Section 37 of SARFAESI Act. Petitioner sought to place on record various documents as detailed in and attached with the application. Said application has been dismissed by learned Presiding Officer, DRT, Visakhapatnam. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner is unable to deny that an efficacious alternate remedy by way of statutory appeal is available to the petitioner. She is unable to point out any special or extraordinary circumstances which call for interference in this matter at this stage in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner is at liberty to raise all available pleas before the appropriate forum. 4. Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of at this stage, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, with liberty to petitioner to avail the remedies as available in accordance with law. No costs. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE Date:30.03.2026 JLV