Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19381 (JHR)

SUNIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6277/2026 · 2026-07-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20117] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6277 of 2026 ------ 1. Sunil Kumar, aged about 31 years, son of Murahu Prasad, resident of 176 Ranchi Road, Marar, P.O. Marar, P.S. and District- Ramgarh. 2. Bilesh Bediya @ Bilesh Kumar, aged about 22 years, son of Situwa Bediya, resident of Manwa Tola near Hanuman Mandir, Post – Hesla, P.S. and District- Ramgarh. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-08-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Basal P.S. Case No.05 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 305(b) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have committed theft of a tractor. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that since from the premises of the petitioners, a stolen tractor without trolly was recovered, hence, the petitioners have been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 12.05.2026 as mentioned in para-08 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner No.2 has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Ramgarh in connection with Basal P.S. Case No.05 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 08.07.2026 Saroj/