( 2026:HHC:33644 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1235 of 2026 Decided on: 11th August, 2026 Sher Chand ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a communication dated 04.08.2026 and copy of office order dated 23.06.2026 passed by the Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, HPPWD, Mandi, which are taken on record. 2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 23.06.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been granted the work charge status after completion of eight years continuous service as daily wage w.e.f. 01.01.2006. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 07.04.2025 passed in CWP No.10377 of 2024, titled, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:33644 ) 2 Sher Chand vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 11th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)