Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19378 (BOM)

SHARAMAT ALIAS SAMEER KADAR SHAIKH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLN/4012/2026 · 2026-10-12

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 43- Cri. Appln. No. 4012-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4012 OF 2026 IN APEALST/10839/2026 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4013 OF 2026 IN APEALST/10839/2026 SHARAMAT ALIAS SAMEER KADAR SHAIKH ….Applicant VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA …..Respondent ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Adinath B. Jagtap APP for Respondents: Mr. G. A. Kulkarni ..... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J. DATED : OCTOBER 12, 2026 ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4012 OF 2026 :- 1. Heard. 2. Issue notice to the respondent. Learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for respondent. 3. The application is for condonation of only 10 days delay in challenging the conviction by the applicant. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. 4. The appeal be registered after removal of all the office objections. After registration, appeal stands Admitted. 5. Call record and proceedings along with the Paper Book. (2) 43- Cri. Appln. No. 4012-2026.odt 6. The application for condonation of delay stands disposed of. IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4013 OF 2026 7. The learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to place on record copies of notes of evidence along with the impugned judgment. 8. Stand over to 19.11.2026. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/