[2026:RJ-JP:1066] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14342/2025 Hassan Abbas S/o Shri Piru Ali, Aged about 37 Years, R/o Badi Masjid Ke Pass Dorai, PS Ramganj, Ajmer. (At present confined at Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through the Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S Hasan, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Fahad Hasan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.18/2022 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Ajmer (Raj.) for offences punishable under Sections 420 & 120B of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that co- accused namely Sukhdev Singh has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since [2026:RJ-JP:1066] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14342/2025] 13.05.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as seven other cases have been registered against him and out of which, six cases are of the same nature. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in two cases, facility of bail has been granted to the petitioner by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the month of December, 2025. Counsel further submits that petitioner is ready to abide all the conditions which may be imposed by this Court. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; co-accused Sukhdev Singh has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court; in two other cases, benefit of bail have already been granted to the petitioner by co-ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Hassan Abbas S/o Shri Piru Ali shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) [2026:RJ-JP:1066] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14342/2025] each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. 8. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded. 9. Concerned SHO shall enter the attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. 11. Office is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 12. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /372