Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19376 (DEL)

JASPREET SINGH & ORS. v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

CRL.M.C./5275/2026 · 2026-09-24

Girish Kathpalia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.M.C. 5275/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010328942026 + CRL.M.C. 5275/2026 JASPREET SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate (through videoconferencing) versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Satender Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for R2 with R2 in person (through videoconferencing) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 562/2022 of PS Geeta Colony for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2 herein) has settled all matrimonial disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa , cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.24 17:11:45 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:24.09.2026 17:15:13 Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 5275/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages 3. The respondent no.2 is present through videoconferencing today and is identified by IO/SI Satender. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. Two children, namely Baby Sukhmani and Master Jot Singh were born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 and those children are in care and custody of respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that now she has got remarried and does not want any compensation in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners. 4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 562/2022 of PS Geeta Colony for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e 26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.24 17:11:32 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:24.09.2026 17:15:13