Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19376 (AP)

Chennuru Bala Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/8196/2026 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010147112026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 8196/2026 Between: 1. CHENNURU BALA KUMAR, S/O LATE CHENNURU BALA GURAYYA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.3/472, SIVANANDA PURAM, PUTLAMPALLI, KADAPA- 516002, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522 238. 2. THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KADAPA-516001, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. BHUMANA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBAIAH, R/O RAMANAPALLI, HARIJANAWADA RAMANAPALLI VILLAGE, CHENNURU MANDAL- 516162, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC FOR M.CORPORATION IN RAYALASEEMA REGION IN 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri V. Sai Ram Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Syam Sundar Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development and Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2. 2. Sri V. Sai Ram Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Syam Sundar Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to pursue the Suit filed by the Petitioner bearing O.S.No.462/2025 pending on the file of the learned II Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kadapa. 3. Having so recorded, the request sought by the Writ Petitioner is granted. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to pursue the Suit and other remedies as available to him under law, if so advised. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:31.03.2026 Vns