1 2026:CGHC:21992 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 649 of 2026 Krishna Kumar Sahu S/o. Late Shri Vishram Sahu Aged About 66 Years R/o. Gram Manohara, P.O. Hathbandh, P.S. Simga, Balodabazar (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Ku. Shwetambhara Sahu D/o. Shri Krishna Kumar Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o. A.K. Pandey, House No. 277, Krishan Nagar, Daganiya, P.S. D.D. Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Shilpa Sahu D/o. Shri Krishna Kumar Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o. A.K. Pandey House No. 277, Krisha Nagar Daganiya, P.S.- D.D. Nagar, Raipur Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Tessy Abraham, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 11.05.2026 1. Heard Mr. Ankush Soni, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer: “ 1. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order of the Family Court, Raipur in Case No. 154/24 Dated 24.10.2024 with immediate effect. 2. Pass such other order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. ” 3. The present criminal revision is beyond time as has been reported by the Registry. 4. From perusal of application for condonation of delay, it is apparent that the applicant has not given day to day explanation of inordinate delay of 456 days in filing the revision, as such, the revision is barred by delay and laches and is not liable to be entertained. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 5. Considering the grounds raised in I.A. No. 02/2026, I do not find any good ground to condone the delay of 456 days in preferring the revision. 6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 02/2026 is rejected and consequently thereto, the revision is also dismissed. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar