- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25866 WP No. 7081 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 7081 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. TRISHUL DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER PARTNERSHIP ACY, 1932 MITTAL TOWERS, NO. 109 "B" WING, 1ST FLOOR, NO. 6, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 01. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. NIRAJ MITTAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VACHAN H.U, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER. 2. MRS. ASHA JHUNJUNWALA WIFE OF SHRI. SAJJAN JHUNJUNWALA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO. 1189, 4TH CROSS, 13TH MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25866 WP No. 7081 of 2024 BENGALURU - 560 038. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AMIT ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNX-A DTD 11.01.2024 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN CMP/181222/0001788 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: "In the circumstances, the Petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased, in the interests of justice and equity, to set aside (Annexure - A) the Impugned Order, dated 11.01.2024 passed by the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority in CMP/181222/0001788 and pass such other orders / or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. What has been challenged is the order dated 11.01.2024 passed by the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority in CMP No.181222/000178. The petitioner has an - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25866 WP No. 7081 of 2024 alternative efficacious remedy of an appeal against the said order before the appellate authority. As such, the above writ petition is not maintainable. 3. Reserving such liberty, the above petition stands disposed of. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23