- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26169 WP No. 37775 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 37775 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: M/S. MANA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 NO.20/7, "SWAMI LEGATO", 3RD FLOOR, KADUBEESANAHALLI, MARATHAHALLI OUTER RING ROAD, BENGALURU 560103 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. D. KISHORE REDDY …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANAPATHI HEGDE, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. VAMSHI KRISHNA C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD 14/3, II FLOOR, R.P.BUILDING, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KRIDE) Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26169 WP No. 37775 of 2025 NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560001 4. RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (KARNATAKA LTD. ) K-RIDE SAMPARKA SOUDHA 1ST FLOOR, OPP. ORION MALL, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR 1ST BLOCK, BENGALURU 560010 5. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI GOPAL B.V., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3; SRI N.N. HARISH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4; SRI MURALI N., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 06.03.2024 (ANNEXURE E) BEARING NO. CI 41 SPQ 2024 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 31.07.2024 (ANNEXURE G) BEARING NO. CI 41 SPQ(E) 2024 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 (STATED AS RESPONDENT NO.3 IN THE PRAYER PORTION OF THE PETITION) BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26169 WP No. 37775 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioner has challenged the preliminary notification bearing No.CI 41 SPQ 2024 dated 06.03.2024 issued by the respondent No.1 and the final notification bearing No.CI 41 SPQ(E) 2024 dated 31.07.2024 issued by the respondent No.1 (stated as respondent No.3 in the prayer portion of the petition) in respect of a portion of the petition schedule property. It has also challenged the subsequent preliminary notification bearing No.CI 05 SPQ 2025 dated 17.01.2025 issued by the respondent No.1 and the final notification bearing No.CI 02 SPQ (E) 2025 dated 29.03.2025 issued by the respondent No.1 in respect of another portion of the petition schedule property. 2. When this petition was listed for orders, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned notifications are issued for acquisition of land for the purpose of laying a track for a sub-urban rail and hence, the petitioner - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26169 WP No. 37775 of 2025 does not wish to challenge the same. He, however, submits that the petitioner has laid a model villa in the area notified for acquisition. He submits that if the petitioner is given reasonable time, it would take steps to remove the model villa and make way for the respondent No.4 to implement the project. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 after seeking instructions, submitted that four months time may be granted to the petitioner to remove the model villa and clear the acquired property for the implementation of the project. 4. Though the learned senior counsel for the petitioner persisted that four months would be too short a time for the petitioner to remove the model villa and clear the area, having regard to the fact that the respondent No.4 has already finalized the project and tenders are yet to be issued, interest of justice would be met by directing the respondent No.4 to allow four months time to the petitioner to remove the construction put up by it within the area notified for acquisition and to hand over vacant possession of the property to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 for implementation of the project. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26169 WP No. 37775 of 2025 5. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not vacate the acquired property, it is open for the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to take necessary action in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed off. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27