( 2026:JHHC:20079 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3594 of 2026 Suraj Kumar, son of Jaylal Vishwkarma, Age about 23 years, resident of village Karai parsurai, P.O. and P.S. Karai Parsurai, P.O. and P.S. Karai Parsurai, District-Nalanda-Bihar ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Bhaskar Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. 02/ 08.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No. 248 of 2019, registered under sections 379, 420 of I.P.C and under sections 66(C)/66(D) of I.T. Act, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C at Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and allegations are made of withdrawing Rs. 1,41,861.22/- fraudulently from the account of the informant and out of that Rs. 10,000/- has been alleged to be transferred in the account of petitioner. He next submits that petitioner has nothing to do with the said transaction. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that out of fraudulently withdrawn amount of Rs. 1,41,861.22/-, the amount of Rs. 10,000/- has been credited in the account of the petitioner. 5. From perusal of F.I.R it transpires that the amount which has been fraudulently withdrawn, out of which Rs. 10,000/- has been credited in the account of the petitioner. ( 2026:JHHC:20079 ) 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.08.07.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-