1 ( 2026:HHC:33035 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 880 of 2025 Decided on: 06.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Richa Mishra ....Petitioner Versus C. Paulrasu & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Chauhan and Mr. Vikrant, Advocates, for applicants/proposed intervenors in CMP No. 10252/2026. Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ridhima Karol, Advocate for the applicants/proposed intervenors in CMP No. 10240/2026. Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage, he does not want to 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:33035 ) press the contempt petition. However, he prayed that for redressal of her further grievance, liberty may be reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, as available to her, under the law. 2. Consequently, the petition is dismissed, as not pressed, with liberty, as aforesaid. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 6th August, 2026 Judge (raman)