Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19361 (AP)

J. Srinivasa Rao v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/8970/2020 · 2026-02-04

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010147052020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8970/2020 Between: 1. J. SRINIVASA RAO,, L.V. DRIVER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, S/O. LATE SREE RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY , R AND B DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAWATHI, AP 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEERR AND B, ELURU. W.G. DISTRICT, AP. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERR AND B, ELURU. W.G. DISTRICT, AP. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERR AND B, KOVVUR, W.G.DIST .AP. 5. THE DY EXECUTIVE ENGINEERR AND B, TANUKU, W.G.DIST .AP. 6. THE ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEERR AND B, PENUGONDA. W.G.DIST, AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 6th respondent in not issuing duty certificate to the petitioner thereby depriving the salary of the petitioner in spite of extracting work in pursuance of the letter vide Proc Dt 21- 2 3-2020, and the action of the other respondents in not taking action on the representations filed by the petitioner on 11 03 2020 as high handed and arbitrary action, capricious, unconstitutional, and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice with a consequential direction to the respondents to pay of the salary of the petitioner along with arrears from 18-10-2019 forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Direct the respondents herein to direction to the respondents to pay of the salary of the petitioner along with arrears from 18-10-2019 forthwith pending disposal of the W.P, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please be vacate the Interim Orders passed on 22.05.2020 in W.P. No. 8970 of 2020 in IA No. I of 2020 and dismiss the writ petition and pass such other Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8970/2020 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a letter dated 04.02.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 05.02.2026 TTPPSS 4 18 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8970/2020 05.02.2026 TTPPSS