IN THE H MK INFRA STATE OF HA CORAM : HO HO Present : Mr Mr Mr Mr Ms DEEPAK SIBA 1. Af the petitioner su petition only wit debarment of the in any of the Government. 2. Lea passed forfeiting as above becaus contract agreeme 3. In seeks to withdra challenge forfeitu any such order is 4. Dis 19.05.2026 Prince Whether reportable :Yes/N Sr. No.139 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CWP-341 Date of D Versus HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPIT Mr. Amit Jhanji, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankit Midha, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Midha, Advocate and Mr. Shashank Shekhar Sharma, Ad Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, H *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) After arguing the matter for some tim ner submits that he has instructions fro ly with regard to the forfeiture of the of the petitioner for a period of two year f the Departments/Boards or Corpor earned State counsel submits that a feiting the petitioner’s earnest money or because through order dated 16.09.202 reement in question has been terminated. In the light of the above, learned Sen ithdraw this petition at this stage wit orfeiture of its earnest money and/or the rder is passed in the future. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty a (DEEPAK JU (LAPITA JU :Yes/No Whether Reasoned : Yes/No JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 34152-2025 te of Decision : 19.05.2026 …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS DEEPAK SIBAL APITA BANERJI te with and a, Advocate for the petitioner. AG, Haryana. me time, learned Senior Counsel for ns from the petitioner to press this f the petitioner’s earnest money and o years from participation in tenders orporations etc. of the Haryana that as of now, no order has been ney or from debarring the petitioner 09.2025 (Annexure P-21), only the inated. ed Senior Counsel for the petitioner ge with liberty to the petitioner to /or the petitioner’s debarment in case berty as prayed for. EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE PITA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.05.22 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document