[2026:RJ-JP:7442] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17566/2022 Smt. Priyanka Sharma D/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad Sharma, W/o Satyaprakash Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Peeplaas, Tehsil Savar, District Ajmer, Presently Resident Of Village Deval, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma Mr. Aayush Bishnoi Mr. Abhinav Srivastava For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma, AAAG for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/02/2026 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “1-Quashed and set-aside the order at. 29.9.2022, issued by the respondent No. 3 to respondent No. 4 and supply the copy to the petitioner, whereby, rejected his candidature for appointment of compassionate appointment, in pursuance point No. 2(iv) of notification dt. 28.10.2021. 2-Directed to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground in pursuance of reference No. 1/2022 titled Priyanka Shrimali Vs State of Rajasthan with all consequential benefits. [2026:RJ-JP:7442] (2 of 3) [CW-17566/2022] 3-Any other appropriate order or direction may also be passed in favour of the humble petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner while referring judgment in case of Priyanka Shrimali Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : Civil Reference No.1/2022 decided on 13.09.2022 by Full Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, submits that the issued raised herein has already been decided and further followed in cases of Meenakshi Trivedi Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16830/2022 and Priyanka Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3719/2024 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the petitioner may submit a representation and same shall be examined in light of ratio laid down in cases of Priyanka Shrimali Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), Meenakshi Trivedi Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Priyanka Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. Heard learned counsel for parties and perused the material placed on record. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in cases of Priyanka Shrimali Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), Meenakshi Trivedi Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Priyanka Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date [2026:RJ-JP:7442] (3 of 3) [CW-17566/2022] of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended to the petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/170