CWP-15070-202 IN TH 133 Sudesh & others State of Haryan CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Mr. Ms *** JAGMOHAN B 1. The the Constitution (Annexure P-5) Haryana has gra Khasra Nos.563 Gurugram. They (Annexure P-8). 2. The District Gurugra respondent No.6 residential house respondent No.6 petitioners raised 2026 -1- N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGAR CW Dat others Versus aryana & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGM Mr. Amandeep Rana, Advocate, for Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryan s. Svaneel Jaswal, Advocate, for r *** AN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioners through instant petit tution of India are seeking setting as 5) whereby respondent No.2-Depu as granted permission for installation os.563, 564 and 565, village Jata . They are further seeking adjudic 8). The petitioners are residents of v urugram. They claim that responde t No.6 are installing a mobile tower houses. Area where the mobile towe t No.6-Amit son of Shri Vishnu Chauh raised their concern and serious obj NJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-15070-2026 Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 …Petitioners …Respondents AGMOHAN BANSAL te, for the petitioners. aryana. , for respondents No.3 & 4. nt petition under Articles 226/227 of ing aside of letter dated 20.01.2026 Deputy Commissioner, Gurugram, allation/erection of mobile tower in e Jatauli, Tehsil Pataudi, District djudication of their representation of village Jatauli, Tehsil Pataudi, pondent No.5 in connivance with tower in the adjoining area of their e tower is being erected belongs to Chauhan. Local residents along with bjections before Sub-Divisional of 2026 , er in strict ation audi, with their gs to with ional VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.14 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-15070-202 Officer (Civil), Jatauli Mandi reg They have also fi Commissioner, G for said tower communication d inspection was d be taken as per R started without fi 3. Lear Nisha, ADA, DC consider petition within four week 4. Lear arrangement. 5. In th of. 14.05.2026 Vimal Wh Wh 2026 -2- ivil), Pataudi and Executive Officer ndi regarding erection of mobile towe also filed representation dated 29.12.2 ner, Gurugram vide Memo dated 20.0 ower erection. Due to public outra ation dated 22.01.2026 requested revo was directed by DC, Gurugram and it s per Rules. Work was initially stopp hout final decision on the complaints s Learned State counsel at the outs A, DC Office, Gurugram submits th etitioners’ representation (Annexure r weeks from today. Learned counsel for the petition In the wake of statement of both sid Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye fficer, Municipal Council, Pataudi e tower in their area but to no avail. 9.12.2025. Respondent No.2-Deputy d 20.01.2026 has granted permission outrage, Municipal Council vide d revocation of the permission. Spot and it was assured that action would stopped but construction again has aints submitted by villagers. e outset on instructions from Ms. its that competent authority would exure P-8) and address the same etitioners agrees to the aforesaid th sides, the petition stands disposed (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No taudi avail. puty ssion vide Spot ould n has Ms. ould same esaid osed AL) VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.14 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.