$~95 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010454022026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1760/2026 ARUN KUMRAR GAUR .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given. versus NIDHI BANSAL .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 22.09.2026 CM APPL. 65407/2026 (Seeking Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1760/2026 3. Petition under Section 10 and 12 read with Sections 2(b) and 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act and Article 215 of Constitution of India read with Rules 5(1)(a) and 7 of the Contempt of Courts (Delhi High Court) Rules, 2025 has been filed in regard to the alleged wilful disobedience of the Order dated 09.04.2026 and G.P. 63/2025 particularly the failure to facilitate visitation on 19.07.2026. Submissions heard. 4. An Application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act was filed by the Petitioner in G.P.No.63/2025 seeking interim custody of the child, wherein the learned Principal Judge, Family Court passed an Order granted the visitation rights to the Petitioner on every alternate Sunday from 05:00 P.M to 06:00 P.M. Apparently, the child was not brought for visitation on 19.07.2026 and a Legal Notice had been issued on behalf of the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 10:49:52 Petitioner. Not only this an Application dated 20.07.2026 has been filed by the Respondent seeking cancellation/modification of the visitation rights granted to the Petitioner herein. 5. Not only this a Contempt Petition under Section 12 read with Section 2(b) of Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the Petitioner in the Guardianship Petition. 6. In the light of the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that the Petitioner is seeking enforcement of an interim visitation Order granted by the Family Courts. Moreover, both the parties have initiated respective remedies in respect of non-compliance of the Order dated 09.04.2026. So much so, the Respondent has even sought cancellation of the visitation rights. 7. From the aforesaid it is evident that it is not a case of wilful disobedience of the Orders of the Court. 8. There is no merit in the Petition which is hereby dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to pursue the remedies in accordance with law. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. SEPTEMBER 22, 2026/VA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 10:49:52