Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19347 (KAR)

M/S ARJUN PACKAGING v. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD

WP/1168/2024 · 2026-06-02

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25851 WP No. 1168 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 1168 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. ARJUN PACKAGING REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRITOR, SRI. M. VIJAYAKUMAR, NO.B-78, BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BOMMASANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 058 2. SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR M AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE B.L. MUNIYAPPA, R/A NO. 1229, 17TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 029. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RENSPRE PRITHESH DSOUZA, ADVOCATE) AND: THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., REGISTERED UNDER BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 HAVING INTERALIA BRANCH AT GANDHINAGAR, NO.22, 2ND CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 002 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JEEVAN KUMAR B.S, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25851 WP No. 1168 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE E-AUCTION SALE OF PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER E-AUCTION SALE NOTICE DTD 01.12.2023 ISSUED BY THE RECOVERY OFFICER-1, DRT-1, BENGALURU IN R.C.NO.10117/2016 (O.A.NO.590/2011) REGARDING THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of Certiorari to quash the E-Auction sale of petition schedule property as per E-auction sale notice E-Auction sale notice dated 01/12/2023 issued by the Recovery officer-1, DRT-1, Bengaluruin R.C. No. 10117/2016 (Ο.Α. No. 590/2011), regarding the petition schedule property produced at ANNEXURE-A. b. Grant any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper reliefs as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of this case. 2. A memo for withdrawal has been filed signed by the counsel for the petitioners, which reads as under: "That the petitioner most humbly submits before this Honorable Court that, the auction was not taken place on - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25851 WP No. 1168 of 2024 the day scheduled for auction of the property and on the other hand the petitioner could not arrange the amount to comply the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court. Hence the present petition has become infructuous and does not survive for consideration. Wherefore, it is most humbly prayed before this Hon'ble Court that, that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with liberty to file fresh petition, in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Accepting the said memo and submission of the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 82