Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19347 (JHR)

BIKRAM GOSWAMI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5046/2026 · 2026-07-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19987] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5046 of 2026 ------ Bikram Goswami age about 20 years S/o- Barun Goswami, R/o- Village- Koldiha, P.O.- Chetadih, P.S.- Giridih (M), District- Giridih .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sreeniwas Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-07-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.77 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 126 (2), 115 (2), 352, 351 (2), 303 (2), 118, 109, 329 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the informant lady- Arti Devi who was not extending the loan facility to the petitioner from the finance company of which he was the Manager. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against Krishna Goswami, Karan Goswami and Gita Devi and the only allegation against the petitioner is that he was also present. It is further submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Giridih in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.77 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-07.07.2026-Animesh/