Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19344 (JHR)

UMA SHANKAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WPC/4683/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19652 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4683 of 2026 ------ Uma Shankar Sharma, S/o Late Satyanarayan Prasad, Resident of 636, Damside, HEC Dhurwa, PO & PS-Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, PO – GPO, PS-Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Circle Officer, Namkum Anchal, PO & PS-Namkum Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Kumar, AC to SC-I ------ 02/ 06th July, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The Mutation Application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Circle Officer, Namkum Anchal, Dist-Ranchi. 3. Admittedly, the order impugned is appealable before the learned LRDC. Being the Appellate Court, he has power to appreciate, re-appreciate evidence and also take an independent view based on documents. If some documents are wanting, he has the power to call for the same and ask the parties to produce the same also. 4. Thus, since there is a remedy of statutory appeal available to the petitioner, the petitioner should challenge the impugned order before the Appellate Authority, who will consider the same on merits and if some documents are necessary for arriving at a proper conclusion, the Appellate Authority may call for the same, which should be produced. The Appellate Authority, since has the power of appreciating, re-appreciating evidence, will judge the issue and will pass an appropriate order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. 5. It is made clear that the petitioner should file an appeal within two weeks along with an application for condonation of delay, which will be considered by the Appellate Authority, 2026:JHHC:19652 Page | 2 considering the pendency of this writ petition before this Court and it is expected that the appeal of the petitioner should be decided on merits. 6. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 06th July, 2026 S.K.D/CP-2 Uploaded on 08.07.2026