PRIYA RANA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6013/2026 · 2026-05-20
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19341 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19341 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-6013-20 IN THE H (148) PRIYA RANA A STATE OF PUN
CORAM: HON
Present: Mr.
Ms. **** MANISHA BAT
1.
The Constitution of In official responde petitioners at the representation da
2.
At t submitted that t 19.05.2026 befo (Annexure P-5) r but the same has 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH
CR
Dat ANA AND ANOTHER
Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Sahil Koundal, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed n of India seeking issuance of a writ o spondents No.2 and 3 to protect th at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 tion dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned couns that the petitioners have recently before the Senior Superintendent o 5) raising their grievances as mentio e has not yet been considered and no
AB AND HARYANA AT
CRWP-6013-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents MANISHA BATRA for the petitioners or DAG, Punjab n filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the tect the life and liberty of the 4 to 6 and to take action on their 5). counsel for the petitioners has ently filed a representation on dent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib mentioned in the present petition no action has been taken AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-6013-20 thereon. He furth satisfied if appr Superintendent representation fil
3.
Noti
4.
Ms. notice on behalf be done in due c her during the co
5.
In v commenting any
disposed of at th aforesaid represe within a period accordance with petitioners, the o in order to protec 20.05.2026 Amit Sharma
2026 (O&M) (2) e further submitted that at this stage f appropriate directions are issued to dent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib tion filed by the petitioners and take ne Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ehalf of the respondents-State and su due course. Let a complete set of the the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made g anything on the merits of the cas f at this stage with a direction to resp epresentation dated 19.05.2026 (Annex eriod of 15 days from today, by pa with law. Needless to say, if an , the official respondents would provi protect their life and liberty. (MA
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
stage, the petitioners would be ued to respondent No.2-Senior hib to decide the aforesaid ake necessary action thereon. nior DAG, Punjab, has advance and submits that the needful will of the paperbook be supplied to made by the petitioners, without the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order in if any threat is found to the provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.