(2026:JHHC:19655) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6222 of 2026 1. Rohit Kumar Sahu, aged about 31 years, 2. Deepak Kumar Sahu, aged about 33 years, (Both sons of Shri Baleshwar Sahu; 3. Pankaj Kumar Sahu, aged about 29 years, son of Mahendra Sahu, (All are residents of village – Hochar, PO – Husir, PS – Kanke, District – Ranchi. … … …Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate : Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 06th July, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.104 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 109(1)/ 126(2)/ 132/ 190/ 191(2)/ 189(2)/221/304(2)/351(2)/351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly attempted to murder the informant and his colleagues and deterred them from discharging their duties; when they went to give possession of the land in an execution case. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there is no allegation of use of any weapon for assault. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.16 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 21.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case nor will go to or upon the place of occurrence land bearing plot no. 683 during the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused persons with similar allegation have already been granted bail on 30.06.2026 passed in B.A. No. 5970 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.104 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case nor will go to or upon the place of occurrence land bearing plot no. G83 during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 06.07.2026 Aditi