Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
HN, J
C.C.No.711_2015 APHC010147032015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 711/2015 Between:
1. VEERA VENKATESHWAR RAO,, S/O LATE VEERA PERUMALLU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: TEA VENDOR, RIO H.NO.5-24-204, SUNNIPENTA, SRISAILAM PROJECT, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI VIJAYANAND, MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD.
2. SRI PRABHAKAR RAO, CHIEF ENGINEER (O&M), SRISAILAM PROJECT, AP GENCO, EAGALAPENTA, MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT.
3. SRI RAMBABU, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (O&M), AP GENCO, SUNNIPENTA, SRISAILAM PROJECT, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. SRI SUDHAKAR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SUB-DIV-II, SRISAILAM PROJECT, AP GENCO, SUNNIPENTA, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
5. THE JOINT SECRETARY PERSONNEL, AP GENCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD-82.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent as per the provisions of
2
HN, J
C.C.No.711_2015 Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by His Lordship Justice Noushad Ali in WPMP No.16662 of 2013 in WP No.13591 of 2013 dated 01-10-2013, in the interest of justice and fair-play, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 397 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to provide suitable employment to the petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the Contempt Case; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO )
3
HN, J
C.C.No.711_2015
ORDER:
1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.13591 of 2013 was closed by this Court by an order dated 11.08.2016. In view of the said order and the closure of the writ petition, nothing further survives for
consideration in the present contempt proceedings.
2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:10.03.2026 NKA
4
HN, J
C.C.No.711_2015 27 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO:711 of 2015 Date: 10.03.2026
NKA