2026:JHHC:19951 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6286 of 2026 --------- Tilak Paswan, aged about 46 years, son of Sukar Paswan, resident of village Kumbhatand, P.O. and P.S. Sariya, Dist. Giridih. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Ms. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pran Pranay, A.P.P. --------- 02/ 07.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(4), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 103(1), 324(3), 352, 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that though charges have been framed on 10.04.2026 but till date no witness has been examined, as such, there is no likelihood of early conclusion of the trial. Learned senior counsel further submits that co-accused namely, Binod Paswan @ Vinod Paswan has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2026, in B.A. No. 6258 of 2026. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.10.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned senior counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the period of custody of the petitioner coupled with the fact that charges have been framed and co-accused has been granted bail; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) 2026:JHHC:19951 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Giridih in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 55 of 2026 arising out of Sariya P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that one of the bailors must be either mother or father of the petitioner and the mobile numbers of the said bailor and petitioner shall be given to the concerned Police Station and the provided mobile numbers shall not be changed till completion of the trial. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 7th July, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 08.07.2026