Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19335 (HP)

ASHOK KUMAR v. SUDHA DEVI AND ANOTHER

COPC/243/2026 · 2026-08-20

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:35246 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.243 of 2026 Date of Decision: 20.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Ashok Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Sudha Devi and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 18.08.2026, wherein it has been stated as under:- “…..Pursuant to the judgment dated 28.05.2025 in CWPOA No.7001/2020, an amount of Rs.57,03,827/- had already been paid to the petitioner by the CMO Sirmaur and as per the demand raised on account of revised upto date calculation with interest and ACPS benefits, an additionality of amount Rs.72,09,618/- has also been allocated to CMO Sirmaur vide letter dated 19.08.2026 for further release to the petitioner, in order to comply with judgment in totality…..” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:35246 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 20, 2026 Judge (Kiran)