Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19333 (KAR)

SRI SRINIVAS RAI v. MISS NEHA

CRL.RP/1677/2025 · 2026-06-04

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26568 CRL.RP No. 1677 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1677 OF 2025 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SRINIVAS RAI S/O NARAYANA RAI, AGED 48 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.115, 1ST FLOOR,INLAND ORNATE, NAVABHARATH CIRCLE, KODIALBAIL, MANGALURU – 575003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED SULTAN,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MISS NEHA D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED 28 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.19-30/1, ”VIDYARANYA”, NEAR BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE,ULLAL, MANGALURU – 575 020, REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. PURUSHOTHAM,S/O LATE M AITHAPPA, AGED 46 YEARS,R/AT DOOR NO.19-30/1, VIDYARANYA, NEAR BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE,ULLAL, MANGALURU 575 020. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO A. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26568 CRL.RP No. 1677 of 2025 JUDGMENT, DATED 14.11.2024 PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT THE COURT OF JMFC IX COURT, MANGALURU IN CC NO.73/2022 BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION.B. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 13.08.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF FIRST APPEAL THE II ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K.MANGALURU IN CRL.A NO.366/2024.I.A.NO.1/2025 FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation on either side. 2. This petition was filed on 07.11.2025. There were 4 office objections. In spite of matter repeatedly posted before the Court as well as before the Registry, the revision petitioner has not complied the same and for the fifth time, this matter is listed for non-compliance. Hence, no ground to grant any adjournment. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7