Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19327 (AP)

Thumu Venkata Krishna Reddy v. S. Suresh Kumar, IAS.

CC/900/2025 · 2026-02-25

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010148002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: 1. THUMU VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. RAMANA REDDY, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3 DISTRIET-523254. 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SS PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. P SAMPATH KUMAR, TH DIRECTOR OF MUNCIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PADMINI ENCLAVE, 4/7 ANNAPURNA NAGAR, 5TH LANE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SMT THAMEEM ANSARIYA, THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. DANIEL JOSEPH, THE KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. P KOTESWARA RAO, THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KANIGIRI MUNICIPALITY, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. P KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, THE COMMISSIONER, KANIGIRI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 900/2025 THUMU VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. RAMANA REDDY, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3-6, BOMMIREDDI PALLE PRAKASAM ...PETITIONER AND S SURESH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SS PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. P SAMPATH KUMAR, THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER DA. DIRECTOR OF MUNCIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PADMINI ENCLAVE, 4/7 ANNAPURNA NAGAR, 5TH LANE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SMT THAMEEM ANSARIYA, THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. DANIEL JOSEPH, THE COMMISSIONER, KANIGIRI MUNICIPALITY, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. P KOTESWARA RAO, THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KANIGIRI MUNICIPALITY, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. P KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, THE COMMISSIONER, KANIGIRI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI THUMU VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. RAMANA REDDY, AGED 6, BOMMIREDDI PALLE PRAKASAM ...PETITIONER S SURESH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SS PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. E COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER DA. DIRECTOR OF MUNCIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PADMINI ENCLAVE, 4/7 ANNAPURNA NAGAR, 5TH LANE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SMT THAMEEM ANSARIYA, THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, KANIGIRI MUNICIPALITY, P KOTESWARA RAO, THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KANIGIRI P KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, THE COMMISSIONER, KANIGIRI 2 MUNICIPALITY, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. R 7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27.11.2025, VIDE IA NO-2/2025 IN CC NO-900 OF 2025 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 26/04/2024 of this Hon'ble Court made in W.P. No.7536/2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the final orders, dated 26/04/2024, passed in W.P. No.7536/2024 IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as respondent no.7 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 26.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.7536 of 2024. Sri Bandla Pavan, learned counsel, representing Sri Kilaru Nithin Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 26.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.7536 of 2024, hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 26.02.2026 MP 4 49 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 900 of 2025 Date: 26.02.2026 MP