Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4391] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14018/2025 Tejveer Singh S/o Yaadram, R/o Village Nagla Sikurra Tasinga, Hathras, Police Station Sadabaad, District Hathras (Up) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. Mr. Surendra Singh, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 30/01/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No. 18/2025 registered with the Police Station Sadar Deeg, District Deeg for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also learned counsel or the complainant.
4.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that accused-petitioner is serving in the Army and there is matrimonial dispute in between the parties.
[2026:RJ-JP:4391] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14018/2025]
5. On perusal of the contents of the F.I.R. there are specific allegations against the accused-petitioner of making use of firearm with an intention to murder the father of the complainant. On perusal of the case diary certain cartridges were recovered from the place of incident.
6. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly there is specific allegations against the accused-petitioner of using firearm, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail.
7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /241