Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19325 (CHH)

LOKNATH PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/288/2026 · 2026-05-11

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22220 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 288 of 2026 1 - Loknath Patel S/o Hiradhar Patel Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Chhote Bhandar Post- Bade Bhandar Tahsil- Pussor District- Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Tejram Patel S/o Tekram Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Chhote Bhandar Post- Bade Bhandar Tahsil- Pussor District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Now Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector/incharge Land Acquisition Officer Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Land Acquisition Officer/s.D.O. Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Jila Vyapar And Udyog Kendra Raigarh Through Its Managing Director, Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Adani Power Limited Raigarh Through Its Managing Director, Registered Office At 31, Jamadar Khana, Gwalior (M.P.) 6 - Vijay Kumar Patel S/o Indal Ram Patel Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Village Chhote Bhandar Post Bade Bhandar Tahsil Pussor District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 7 - Chandrshekhar Patel S/o Yuvraj Patel Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Chhote Bhandar Post Bade Bhandar, Tahsil Pussor, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 8 - Nohar Lal Patel S/o Jai Singh Patel Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Chhote Bhandar Post Bade Bhandar, Tahsil Pussor, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 9 - Jhanak Ram Nishad S/o Daityari Nishad Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Chhote Bhandar Post Bade Bhandar, Tahsil Pussor, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 10 - Vishram Nishad S/o Daityari Nishad Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chhote Bhandar Post- Bade Bhandar, Tahsil- Pussor, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 2 11 - Dukhi Ram Nishad S/o Daityari Nishad Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Chhote Bhandar Post- Bade Bhandar, Tahsil- Pussor, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellant : Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer and Ms. Sakshi Chabra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Adv. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 12.05.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this MCC. 2. The other side has no objection. 3. Accordingly, this MCC is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if