APHC010142152013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5557/2013 Between: 1. K.LAKSHMINARAYANA,, S/O RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O MALLEMPALLI VILLAGE, NAGIRAPADU POST & GRAMPANCHAYAT, CHILLAVELU MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. 2. M.PENCHAILAIAH,, S/O VENKATA NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O SINGANAMALA VILLAGE, SINGAREDDY POST, PENAGALURU MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. 3. M.SHANKARAIAH,, S/O LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, K.S.AGRAHARAM VILLAGE & POST, CHELLAVELU MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. 4. REDDIPAKA VENKATAIAH,, S/O VENKATA NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O C.M.RAJAPALLI POST & VILLAGE, CHILLIVELU MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (RD-II), SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGMENT AGENCY - CUM ADDITIONAL DISTRICT PROGRAMME CONVENER, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the to declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings in show cause notice No.3318/HR(A)/EGS/2012, dated 24.4.2012 to the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners did not provide sufficient man-days and orally instructing the petitioners that they are terminated from services as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioners as Filed Assistants in their respective Villages with all consequential and incidential beneifts and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 6931 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent to continue the petitioners as Field Assistant in the respective village pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 35942 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 Order:- There is no representation for the petitioners. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the petitioners have opted to continue as senior mates and this Court, vide order dated 25.02.2013, granted interim direction. It is submitted that the contract period of the petitioners has also ended long back. 3. In view of the same, no cause survives in the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 09.02.2026 PNS