CHOTU @ CHOTU ANSARI @ ARWAJ ANSARI @ MD. ARWAJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5205/2026 · 2026-07-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19321 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19321 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:19991] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5205 of 2026
------ Chotu @ Chhotu Ansari @ Arwaj Ansari @ Md. Arwai Ansari, aged about 24 Years, Son of Md. Fida Ansari, Resident of Village – Near Shiv Mandari, Dalahi land, Khas Sijua, P.O. – Sijua, P.S.- Tetulmari, District- Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-07-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tetulmari P.S. Case No.62 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and has looted ATM Card, one mobile phone, Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Driving Licence and cash of Rs.10,000/- from the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner has been named in the FIR on the basis of his name being taken by the co-accused but the informant has no prior acquaintance with the petitioner; still without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-02 of the supplementary affidavit, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.03.2026 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is
submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Tetulmari P.S. Case No.62 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.07.2026 Saroj/