( 2026:HHC:34705 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1337 of 2026 Decided on: 17th August, 2026 Arun Kumar and others ....Petitioners versus State of H.P. and another ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of communication dated 14.08.2026 and copy of office order dated 12.05.2026 passed by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, which are taken on record. 2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 12.05.2026 reveals that the petitioners have been allowed the benefit of revised emoluments on contract basis as per Government Notification dated 12.01.2022. The Principals of the concerned schools where the petitioners are presently 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:34705 ) 2 working have been directed to fix the pay of the petitioners for the period they served on contract basis till their regularization, subject to the final outcome of LPA being filed by the State and other legal remedies. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 05.01.2026 passed in CWP No.85 of 2026, titled, Arun Kumar and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr., has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioners within eight weeks from today, they shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. 4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 17th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)