Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26044-DB WP No. 6602 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 6602 OF 2026 (KLGP) BETWEEN: YALLAPPA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/A BELLATHUR VILLAGE, KADUGODI POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU 560 067. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAHUL S. REDDY.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 078.
2.
THE TASILDHAR, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26044-DB WP No. 6602 of 2026
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 21.01.2026 PASSED ON IA No.1 IN No. L.G.C (G) No.
1870/2024 BY THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURTS, AT BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a Memo to withdraw this writ petition which has been filed challenging the order dated 21.01.2026 passed in IA No.1 by the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court at Bengaluru, (Court Hall No. 1) in LGC (G) No. 1870/2024.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26044-DB WP No. 6602 of 2026
2. The Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court has rejected the objections filed by the petitioner against the proceedings initiated and has taken cognizance and issued summons for their appearance. We find no reason to interfere with the well reasoned order inasmuch as the learned Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court has considered all submissions and the evidence on record in the proceedings. Be that as it may, as the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition, we permit the petitioner to withdraw in terms of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7