SANJAY SHARMA S/O BRAHMADEV SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CCP/1289/2025 · 2026-02-17
Anil Kumar Upman, Sudesh Bansal
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19312 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19312 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7530-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1289/2025 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4783/2003 Sanjay Sharma S/o Brahmadev Sharma, Aged About 54 Years, R/o S-2, Balaji Vihar, Swej Farm, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Mr. Devashish Pushti, Additional Chief Secretary (UDH) Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Mrs. Anandi, Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority Jln, Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Mr. Nishant Jain, Secretary JDA, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. Mr. Rahul Kotki, Dig Enforcement JDA, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Mr. Adarsh Choudhary, Chief Controller Enforcement JDA, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Mr. Narendra Arya, Director Law JDA, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
8. Mr. Rakesh Meena, Deputy Commissioner Zone-5, JDA, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
9. Mr. Rakesh Pathak, Enforcement Officer Zone-5, JDA, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
10. Mrs. Gunjan Verma, Sho Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
11. Mrs. Manju Rajpal, Acs/Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Sahakar Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
12. Mrs. Harpreet Kaur, Deputy Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Mini Secretariat, Jaipur City
13. Mrs. Rajshree, Liquidator, Shanti Nagar Housing Co- Operative Society, Mini Secretariat, Jaipur City.
14. Mahesh Agarwal Son of Late Dwarka Prasad Agarwal, Resident D-8 Dwarkapuri Rpa Road Panipech Jaipur (Raj) ----Respondents
[2026:RJ-JP:7530-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1289/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/02/2026
1. Instant contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, alleging disobedience/non-compliance of the order dated 20.10.2004 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4783/2003 titled as Suo Moto Vs. State of Rajasthan.
2. After arguing the contempt petition for some time, counsel for petitioner does not want to press the present contempt petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Accordingly, present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J LALIT MOHAN /1