APHC010144902013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 28519/2013 Between: 1. CH.BHASKAR RAO, S/O LAKSHMAIAH AGED 57 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, E.NO.350237, JAGGAIAHPET DEPOT KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC, JAGGAIAHPET DEPOT, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE APSRTC, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BUS BHAVAN HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the annual grade increments and all consequential benefits which are due to the petitioner herein basing on the final orders passed by the 2nd respondent vide Proc.No.PA/19(54)11-RM/K, dated 24-09-2011 in the appeal filed by the petitioner, as highly illegal, arbitrary and consequentially, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to declare that the petitioner herein entitled for annual grade increments as per the Proceedings No.PA/19(54)11-RM/K, dated 24-09-2011 passed by the 2nd respondent. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 35390 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03-09-2013 for releasing the annual grade increments which are due to the petitioner basing on the Proceedings No.PA/19(54)11-RM/K, dated 24-09- 2011 of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following: 3 Order:- This writ petition was filed challenging the action of the respondents in not releasing the annual grade increments and all consequential benefits which are due to the petitioner herein, based on the final orders passed by the 2nd respondent vide Proc.No.PA/19(54)11-RM/K, dated 24-09-2011, in the appeal filed by the petitioner. 2. This Court granted interim direction on 03.10.2013. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, in terms of compliance with the interim direction, nothing further survives to be adjudicated on merits. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.02.2026 PNS